Leider ist der Eintrag nur auf Französisch verfügbar.
Alle Beiträge von Pierre-Yves Modicom
[PUBL] Harchaoui / Modicom (Hgg.), Verb-third phenomena in Germanic verb-second languages: Historical and variational perspectives
Harchaoui, Sarah & Modicom, Pierre-Yves (Hgg.). 2025. Verb-third phenomena in Germanic verb-second languages: Historical and variational perspectives. (Open Germanic Linguistics 15). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16309627
Open Access: https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/486
Synopsis
With the exception of English and its varieties, all Present-Day Germanic languages display some kind of verb-second (V2) rule, according to which the finite verbal form has to be put in the second position of the clause in declarative utterances. But even within the Germanic domain, the exact contours of the V2 rule vary strongly in time and space. Above all, the so-called bottleneck demanding that one and only one constituent be placed before the finite verb is not equally respected in all Germanic varieties. The typology of V2 violations, apparent or real, is now regarded as a core question for the typology of V2 itself. The present volume is concerned with all kinds of alleged “cracks in the bottleneck”, involving argument stacking, remnant movement, or adverbial resumption. A general introduction by Modicom and Harchaoui discusses the current state of linguistic research on verb-third phenomena in Germanic languages, both in synchrony and diachrony. The introduction is followed by a diachronic panorama of V3 phenomena in the history of High German, by A. Speyer, who shows that behind the apparent stability of V2, the syntactic typology of apparent V3 in German has undergone significant changes over the last centuries. The other contributions to the volume follow this variational and historical thread: E. Klaevik-Pettersen and N. Catasso discuss the validity of the bottleneck hypothesis in present and ancient V2 varieties. E. Louviot, Th. Robin, Chr. Nilsen and B. Bloom focus on verb-third phenomena involving resumptive items in the history of English, High German, Low German and Swedish. In their paper on Old West Germanic verse corpora, Louviot and Robin concentrate on clause-initial tha/tho, investigating which factors determine its capacity to either be followed by the finite verb (V2) or by another constituent before the finite verb (V3). Nilsen is concerned with the semantic evolution of verb-third adverbial resumption involving da and så in Swedish. Bloom focuses on the V3 use of one resumptive, so, in Early New High German during the 16th century, tackling the discourse-organizational factors behind adverbial resumption. Finally, the chapters by L. Riccardelli, R. Madaro, A. Tomaselli and E. Bidese investigate how contact between Germanic and Romance may have interacted with language-internal dynamics in the history of several varieties of Rhaeto-Romance (Riccardelli) and Upper German (Madaro, Tomaselli and Bidese).
(Français) [PUBL] Max Sievers: Libre Pensée, démocratie, socialisme
Subject Properties in Early Modern Germanic Languages (Modicom, 2025)
Subject Properties in Early Modern Germanic Languages : A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study
Pierre-Yves Modicom
DOI : 10.1515/9783111544632
De Gruyter 2025
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111544632/html
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05032229v1
This monograph is devoted to the cross-linguistic profile of subjects in Early Modern Germanic languages. The typologically complex question of subject criteria is addressed in a functional framework relying on recent developments in Construction Grammar. The set of data is extracted from a parallel corpus made up of the 1587 German chapbook about the life of Dr. Faustus and its English, Dutch and Danish translations, all of which had been published by 1592. At that time, the syntactic features of English subjects were still comparable to Continental languages like Danish, facilitating the inclusion of English in a cross-Germanic analysis. The analysis makes use of two comparative concepts of subjecthood; argumental subjecthood, centred on the argument-structural characteristics of subjects, and informational subjecthood, which corresponds to the syntacticization of information-structural properties. Subjecthood is defined as a labile multi-level configuration of argumental and informational parameters. This approach sheds new light on notorious tricks of Germanic syntax such as oblique subjects, expletives, scrambling and subjectless passives.
For a long summary, please follow this link: https://minimamodalia.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/modicom_subjects_summary2025.pdf

(Français) CFP The typology of non-canonical subjects (ALT 2026, Lyon)
[Paris, 5-6/06/25] 12. Treffen des internationalen offenen Arbeitskreises Modalität im Deutschen und im Sprachenvergleich
Paris, Sorbonne Université, 5.-6. Juni 2025
Organisation: Olivier Duplâtre (Sorbonne Université) & Pierre-Yves Modicom (Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3)
Seit seiner Gründung im Jahre 1992 hat der offene Internationale Arbeitskreis Modalität im Deutschen bereits elf Tagungen abgehalten. Im Vordergrund steht nicht mehr das Deutsche allein, sondern der Fokus der Konferenz hat sich auf alle germanischen Sprachen und auf kontrastive Perspektiven erweitert, insbesondere innerhalb der germanischen Sprachfamilie und zwischen dem Deutschen und anderen Sprachen. Das Verhältnis zwischen epistemischer Modalität und Evidentialität, die inzwischen oft unter der Makrokategorie „Epistemizität“ zusammengefasst werden, ist zu einem wiederkehrenden Thema geworden. Dasselbe gilt für die Schnittstellen zu Aspekt und Zeitlichkeit.
Das 12. Treffen des offenen Arbeitskreises findet vom 5. bis 6. Juni 2025 in Paris an der Sorbonne-Universität statt.
PROGRAMM
| THURSDAY AM | Modality in the adverbial and adjectival domain |
|
9 : 00 Tanja Mortelmans University of Antwerp, Belgium |
Modaladverbien der epistemischen Möglichkeit im Vergleich: ENG perhaps/maybe, DE vielleicht/womöglich/möglicherweise, NDL misschien |
| 9 : 30 Olivier Duplâtre
Sorbonne University, France |
Is unbedingt a modal word? |
| Coffee Break | |
| 10: 30 Eva Schultze Berndt & Martina Faller
University of Manchester, Great-Britain |
An apprehensive use of German nachher |
| 11 : 00 Carolin Reinert, Cecile Meier & Helmut Weiß
University of Frankfurt, Germany |
Force variability and aspect in German adjectival suffixes |
| Lunch | |
| THURSDAY PM | 1. Variationist perspectives |
| 14: 30 Topias Aalto
University of Turku, Finland |
Daz die engele niht liehter dorften sín. Epistemisch deutbare Belege des mittelhochdeutschen Modalverbs durfen |
| 15: 00 Philipp Pfeifer & Elisabeth Scherr
University of Graz, Austria |
Gründe für Vermutungen. Die Ausbildung epistemischer Bedeutungsvarianten von dürfen |
| 15 : 30 Caterina Saracco
University of Milan, Italy |
Germanic-Romance language contact in the Western Alps: modal verbs and modality in the titsch language of Gressoney between purism and current usage |
| Coffee break | |
| 2. Specialized discourse | |
| 16: 30 Lejla Zejnilovic
University Mediterranean Podgorica. Montenegro |
Context-induced certainty: an empirical study of lexical exponents of propositional modality in juridical setting |
| 17 : 00 Irina Schipowa (online)
Moscow Pedagogical State University, Russia |
Diskursmodalität der Bundestagsreden |
| FRIDAY AM | Testing modality |
| 9: 30 Nadine Dietrich
University of Edinburgh, Great-Britain |
Using dynamic modality as a stress test for the standard conception of modality |
| Coffee break | |
| 10: 30 Patrick Duffley
University Laval, Canada |
Subjective vs. objective modality: a perfectly non-linguistic distinction in English |
| 11 : 00 Jiqiang Lu & Kristin Davidse
KU Leuven, Belgium |
Modal values and NEG-raising in I think, I’m sure and there is a/some chance |
| Lunch | |
| FRIDAY PM | Temporality, modality, subordination |
| 15: 00 Anna Socka
University of Gdansk, Poland |
Zum Schicksalsfutur im Deutschen und Polnischen |
| 15: 30 Giuliano Armenante
University of Potsdam, Germany |
(Non-)Sequence of Tense in West Germanic: Case reopened |
| Coffee break | |
| 16: 30 Anna Averina (online)
Moscow Region State University, Russia |
Мodale Interpretation der Tempusformen im Deutschen und im Russischen |
| 17: 00 Olga Kostrova (online)
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, Russia |
Modalität der Äußerungen mit reduzierten Nebensätzen im Deutschen und im Russischen |
| Conclusion |
Cross-Germanic and ecolinguistics: Dijon, 24/01/25
The third installment of the joint seminar for cross-Germanic linguistics will begin next week, Friday, Jan. 24th, 14.00-17.00 (CET) on the Dijon campus. The room number will be communicated on January 23rd.
This year, the joint seminar will be devoted to ecolinguistics and language ecology.
Here’s the programme of the session in Dijon:
- Introduction, by the workshop organizers
- Laurent Gautier, Université Bourgogne Europe, Centre Interlangues Texte Image Langage (UR 4182), LSP research meets ecology of language. Reflexions on a potential working program.
- Anatole Danto, Département d’anthropologie/Univ. de Tartu & CREE, Inalco : Navigating changing coasts. Northern Europe on the move: languages, communities, bio/diversity
You can also take part on Teams : please send an e-mail to laurent.gautier (at) ube.fr or pierre-yves.modicom (et) univ-lyon3.fr
The second session will be in Lyon on March 14th and the third, in Paris (April 11th).
All the best
Laurent Gautier (Dijon), Sarah Harchaoui (Paris), Pierre-Yves Modicom (Lyon)
(Français) Appel: Linguistique et IA, Dresde, 01-02/10/2025
(Français) [Publ] Grammaire progressive de l’allemand